2001 Citroen C3 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C3. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-350 weights approximately 518 kg more than 2001 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C3 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C3 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 978 kg | 1496 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 62 L |