2001 Citroen C3 vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C3. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 2010 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C3 | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C3 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |