2001 Citroen C3 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C3. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen C3. (115 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Citroen C3 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | C3 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |
