2001 Citroen C3 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 659 kg more than 2001 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen C3. (115 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen C3. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 2001 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2001 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C3 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | C3 | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1138 kg | 1797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |