2001 Citroen C5 vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2001 Citroen C5 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C5. (59 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Citroen C5 weights approximately 870 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Because 1963 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Lotus Elan (138 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen C5. (115 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1963 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen C5. 2001 Citroen C5 has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen C5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C5 | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Citroen | Lotus |
Model | C5 | Elan |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 72.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 183 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1464 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |