2001 Citroen C5 vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2001 Citroen C5 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Citroen C5 weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Citroen C5 | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Citroen | Lotus |
| Model | C5 | Elan |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 104 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 45 L |
