2001 Citroen C5 vs. 2009 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2009 Lotus Elise is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Citroen C5 (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2009 Lotus Elise. (189 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 2009 Lotus Elise. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Citroen C5 weights approximately 594 kg more than 2009 Lotus Elise. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Lotus Elise is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Lotus Elise. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Citroen C5 (285 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lotus Elise. (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 2001 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lotus Elise. 2001 Citroen C5 has automatic transmission and 2009 Lotus Elise has manual transmission. 2009 Lotus Elise will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen C5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C5 | 2009 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Citroen | Lotus |
Model | C5 | Elise |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1548 kg | 954 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.3 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 40 L |