2001 Citroen Osee vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph
To start off, 2001 Citroen Osee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (318 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2001 Citroen Osee. (191 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen Osee.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (489 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen Osee. (272 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen Osee.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen Osee | 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph | |
Make | Citroen | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Osee | Silver Seraph |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 5379 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 272 Nm | 489 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1520 mm |