2001 Citroen Osee vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen Osee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen Osee would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2001 Citroen Osee. (191 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen Osee.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (350 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen Osee. (272 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen Osee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Citroen Osee | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Citroen | Lotus |
| Model | Osee | Evora |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 272 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1229 mm |
