2001 Citroen Xsara vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2001 Citroen Xsara is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Citroen Xsara (106 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Citroen Xsara (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2001 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen Xsara | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Xsara | 66 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |