2001 Citroen Xsara vs. 1982 Zastava 750

To start off, 2001 Citroen Xsara is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Citroen Xsara (106 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 608 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Citroen Xsara (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750. 2001 Citroen Xsara has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen Xsara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: