2001 Citroen Xsara vs. 2003 MG ZT

To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2001 Citroen Xsara. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 405 kg more than 2001 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen Xsara. (120 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Citroen Xsara 2003 MG ZT
Make Citroen MG
Model Xsara ZT
Year Released 2001 2003
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1360 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 72 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 120 Nm 215 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 2100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1080 kg 1485 kg
Vehicle Length 4200 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2760 mm