2001 Citroen Xsara vs. 2009 Koenigsegg CCX
To start off, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Koenigsegg CCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 700 more horse power than 2001 Citroen Xsara. (106 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 68 kg more than 2009 Koenigsegg CCX.
Because 2009 Koenigsegg CCX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Koenigsegg CCX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX (919 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 679 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen Xsara. (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2009 Koenigsegg CCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen Xsara. 2001 Citroen Xsara has automatic transmission and 2009 Koenigsegg CCX has manual transmission. 2009 Koenigsegg CCX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen Xsara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen Xsara | 2009 Koenigsegg CCX | |
Make | Citroen | Koenigsegg |
Model | Xsara | CCX |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 806 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 919 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 400 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.4 seconds | 3.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.5 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.8 L/100km | 18 L/100km |