2001 Daewoo Kalos vs. 1966 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2001 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Kalos (108 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1966 Ford Falcon. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Kalos should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Falcon weights approximately 42 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Kalos.

Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Falcon (188 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Kalos. (145 Nm). This means 1966 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Kalos. 2001 Daewoo Kalos has automatic transmission and 1966 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1966 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Daewoo Kalos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: