2001 Daewoo Korando vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Korando is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Korando. (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Korando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 207 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Korando. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Korando, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Korando. (145 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Korando.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Daewoo Korando | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Daewoo | Jaguar |
| Model | Korando | XK |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 3441 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1088 kg | 1295 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2600 mm |
