2001 Daewoo Korando vs. 1962 Morris Minor
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Korando is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morris Minor would be higher. At 3,199 cc, 2001 Daewoo Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Korando (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1962 Morris Minor. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Korando should accelerate faster than 1962 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Korando weights approximately 288 kg more than 1962 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Korando, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Daewoo Korando (145 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Morris Minor. (81 Nm). This means 2001 Daewoo Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Korando | 1962 Morris Minor | |
Make | Daewoo | Morris |
Model | Korando | Minor |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1098 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 81 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1088 kg | 800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2190 mm |