2001 Daewoo Korando vs. 1966 Rover P5

To start off, 2001 Daewoo Korando is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rover P5 would be higher. At 3,199 cc, 2001 Daewoo Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Rover P5 (122 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Korando. (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Rover P5 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Korando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rover P5 weights approximately 642 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Korando. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Korando, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Rover P5 (217 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Korando. (145 Nm). This means 1966 Rover P5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Korando.

Compare all specifications: