2001 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1963 Triumph Vitesse

To start off, 2001 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Lanos (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 155 kg more than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Daewoo Lanos (150 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (125 Nm). This means 2001 Daewoo Lanos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Vitesse.

Compare all specifications: