2001 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Clio (171 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Clio weights approximately 20 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault Clio (200 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (150 Nm). This means 2000 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Lanos | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Daewoo | Renault |
Model | Lanos | Clio |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1055 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2480 mm |