2001 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 300 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Because 2008 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (150 Nm). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Daewoo Lanos | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Daewoo | Renault |
| Model | Lanos | Clio |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2946 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 301 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1335 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 61 L |
