2001 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Lanos (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (70 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2009 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Daewoo Lanos (150 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (92 Nm). This means 2001 Daewoo Lanos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Daewoo Lanos | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Daewoo | Smart |
| Model | Lanos | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 1870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 33 L |
