2001 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (150 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Daewoo Lanos | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Daewoo | Ford |
| Model | Lanos | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3193 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 74 L |
