2001 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 2,183 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 6 (127 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 6 weights approximately 515 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 6 (340 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (150 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Lanos | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Lanos | 6 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 340 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1550 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 70 L |