2001 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C (156 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C (250 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (150 Nm). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Lanos | 2012 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Daewoo | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Lanos | C |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 66 L |