2001 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 97 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 105 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Rezzo. (148 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Rezzo | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Rezzo | Tempo |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1759 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2540 mm |