2001 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Rezzo.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Rezzo. (148 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Rezzo | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Daewoo | Nissan |
Model | Rezzo | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1759 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |