2001 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 181 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Rezzo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Rezzo. (148 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Daewoo Rezzo | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Volvo |
| Model | Rezzo | C30 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |
