2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 1964 Ford Zephyr
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Vada is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 1,703 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Vada (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1964 Ford Zephyr. (72 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Zephyr. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Vada weights approximately 168 kg more than 1964 Ford Zephyr. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Daewoo Vada (144 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Zephyr. (129 Nm). This means 2001 Daewoo Vada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 1964 Ford Zephyr | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Vada | Zephyr |
Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1703 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 129 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1145 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2720 mm |