2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 1973 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2001 Daewoo Vada is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1973 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Jaguar XJ (251 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 522 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Jaguar XJ (409 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 1973 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.

Compare all specifications: