2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 1980 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Vada is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Vada (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Cougar. (97 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 17 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Because 1980 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mercury Cougar (218 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 1980 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 1980 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Daewoo | Mercury |
Model | Vada | Cougar |
Year Released | 2001 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3271 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1330 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2690 mm |