2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 1996 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Vada is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Vada weights approximately 251 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada. 2001 Daewoo Vada has automatic transmission and 1996 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 1996 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Daewoo Vada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 1996 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Daewoo | Dodge |
Model | Vada | Ram |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5200 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1062 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3530 mm |