2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2000 Jaguar XKR
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Vada is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKR would be higher. At 3,982 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKR (370 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKR should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKR weights approximately 422 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar XKR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar XKR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKR (541 Nm) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2000 Jaguar XKR | |
Make | Daewoo | Jaguar |
Model | Vada | XKR |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3982 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 370 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 541 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1735 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2590 mm |