2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2002 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK (291 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK weights approximately 387 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK (393 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2002 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Daewoo | Jaguar |
Model | Vada | XK |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3996 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 291 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 393 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1700 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2600 mm |