2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 163 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Vada | 6 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1476 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2680 mm |