2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (147 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 138 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Daewoo Vada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (224 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Daewoo | Jeep |
Model | Vada | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2425 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 224 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1451 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2380 mm |