2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2006 Mazda Drifter
To start off, 2006 Mazda Drifter is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 2,606 cc, 2006 Mazda Drifter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Drifter (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Drifter should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Because 2006 Mazda Drifter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda Drifter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Drifter (206 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda Drifter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada. 2001 Daewoo Vada has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda Drifter has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda Drifter will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Daewoo Vada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2006 Mazda Drifter | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Vada | Drifter |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2606 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 206 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3010 mm |