2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 402 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 486 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Daewoo Vada | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Daewoo | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Vada | CLS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 507 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
