2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2006 Suzuki Wagon R+

To start off, 2006 Suzuki Wagon R+ is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2001 Daewoo Vada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Vada (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2006 Suzuki Wagon R+. (93 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada should accelerate faster than 2006 Suzuki Wagon R+. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Vada weights approximately 335 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Wagon R+. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Suzuki Wagon R+ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Daewoo Vada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Wagon R+ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Daewoo Vada (144 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Wagon R+. (118 Nm). This means 2001 Daewoo Vada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Wagon R+. 2001 Daewoo Vada has automatic transmission and 2006 Suzuki Wagon R+ has manual transmission. 2006 Suzuki Wagon R+ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Daewoo Vada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: