2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 718 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Daewoo Vada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Daewoo | Jeep |
Model | Vada | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2776 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 2031 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2660 mm |