2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (347 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1042 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Daewoo Vada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (520 Nm) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Daewoo | Jeep |
Model | Vada | Commander |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5654 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 347 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 520 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 2355 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2790 mm |