2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (113 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 87 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (165 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada. 2001 Daewoo Vada has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 5 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Daewoo Vada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Vada | 5 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1798 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 165 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1400 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2760 mm |