2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2010 Nissan Versa
To start off, 2010 Nissan Versa is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Versa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Versa (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Versa should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Vada weights approximately 91 kg more than 2010 Nissan Versa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Versa (172 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan Versa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada. 2001 Daewoo Vada has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan Versa has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan Versa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Daewoo Vada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2010 Nissan Versa | |
Make | Daewoo | Nissan |
Model | Vada | Versa |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1800 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1222 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2601 mm |