2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura TL (280 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Acura TL weights approximately 377 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Acura TL (344 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2012 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2012 Acura TL | |
Make | Daewoo | Acura |
Model | Vada | TL |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3500 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 344 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1690 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2776 mm |