2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (391 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 647 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Daewoo Vada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Ram (552 Nm) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2012 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Daewoo | Dodge |
Model | Vada | Ram |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5654 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 391 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 552 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3560 mm |