2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2012 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2012 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki SX4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki SX4 (150 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki SX4 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Vada weights approximately 13 kg more than 2012 Suzuki SX4.
Because 2012 Suzuki SX4 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Daewoo Vada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki SX4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki SX4 (190 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2012 Suzuki SX4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada. 2001 Daewoo Vada has automatic transmission and 2012 Suzuki SX4 has manual transmission. 2012 Suzuki SX4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Daewoo Vada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2012 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | Daewoo | Suzuki |
Model | Vada | SX4 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 190 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2500 mm |