2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche (316 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 1246 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Daewoo Vada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche (454 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Daewoo | Chevrolet |
Model | Vada | Avalanche |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5328 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 316 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 454 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 2559 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3302 mm |