2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 614 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Vada | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3726 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1927 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2875 mm |