2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Daewoo Vada (144 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2001 Daewoo Vada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Daewoo | Smart |
Model | Vada | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 1867 mm |