2001 Dodge Durango vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 124 more horse power than 2001 Dodge Durango. (233 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2001 Dodge Durango.
Because 2001 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Dodge Durango. (399 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Dodge Durango. 2001 Dodge Durango has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2009 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Dodge Durango will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Dodge Durango | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Durango | UTE |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4702 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 233 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 399 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |