2001 Dodge Hemi Super 8 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2001 Dodge Hemi Super 8 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Hemi Super 8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Dodge Hemi Super 8 (353 HP) has 289 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Hemi Super 8 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Dodge Hemi Super 8 weights approximately 499 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Dodge Hemi Super 8 (536 Nm) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2001 Dodge Hemi Super 8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Dodge Hemi Super 8 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Hemi Super 8 | EJ |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 353 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 536 Nm | 163 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1633 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2680 mm |